A NEW CONCEPT OF ONTOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS: TOWARD TO SYNTHESIS OF TAXONOMY, ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENETICS
https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2010-4-17-20
Abstract
During last decade traditional morphological paradigm of evolutionary biology has been challenged. Despite on technological advancements the current evolutionary paradigm still lacking organism shape changing theory. The links between evolution, ontogeny, systematics and phylogentics are prima facie obvious, but similarly greatly underestimated currently, though the field of the "Evo-devo" is continuously growing. As a synthesis (or more exactly, re-synthesis) of still in considerable degree developed independently major biological fields, i.e. ontogeny, evolution and taxonomy, new conception of ontogenetic systematics is therefore suggested and illustrated by the examples from the nudibranch molluscs.
References
1. l.Scotland R.W., Olmstead R.G., Bennett J.R. Phylogeny reconstruction: The role of morphology // Syst. Biol. 2003. Vol. 52. P. 539—548.
2. Lartillot N., Philippe H. Improvement of molecular phylogenetic inference and the phylogeny of Bilateria // Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London. 2008. Ser. B. Vol. 363. P. 1463—1472.
3. Павлинов И.Я. Слово о современной систематике. Современная систематика, методологические аспекты / Под ред. И.Я. Павлинова // Сб. Тр. Зоол. муз. МГУ. 1996. Т. 34. С. 7—54.
4. Северцов А.Н. Этюды по теории эволюции. Индивидуальное развитие и эволюция. Киев: Типогр. Имп. ун-та Св. Владимира, 1912. 300 с.
5. Gould S.J. Ontogeny and phylogeny. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 1977. 501 p.
6. Linnaeus C. Systema natur® per regna tria natur®, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Editio decima, reformata. Hol- mi®: Salvius, 1758. 824 p.
7. Minelli A. Phyloevo-devo: combining phylogenetics with evolutionary developmental biology // BMC Biology. 2009. Vol. 7: P. 36.
8. Mартынов А.В. От онтогенеза к эволюции: систематика в ожидании смены парадигмы. Эволюция и систематика: Ламарк и Дарвин в современных исследованиях / Под ред. А.В. Свиридова, А.И. Шаталкина // Сб. Тр. Зоол. Муз. МГУ. 2009. Т. 50. С. 145—229.
9. Albert V.A., Gustafsson M.H.G., Di Laurenzio L. Onto- genetic systematics, molecular developmental genetics, and the angiosperm petal // Molecular systematics of plants II / Eds. P.S. Soltis, D.E. Soltis, J.J. Doyle. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. P. 349—374.
10. Sander K. The evolution of patterning mechanisms: gleanings from insect embryogenesis and spermatogenesis // Development and evolution / Eds. B.C. Goodwin, N. Hol¬der, C.C. Wylie // The Sixth Symposium of the British Society for Developmental Biology. Cambridge: Univ. Press, 1983. P. 137—158.
11. Valdes A., Bouchet P. A blind abyssal Corambidae (Mollusca, Nudibranchia) from the Norwegian Sea, with a re- evaluation of the systematics of the family // Sarsia. 1998. Vol. 83. N 1. P. 15—20.
12. Millen S.V., Martynov A.V. Redescriptions of the nu- dibranch genera Akiodoris Bergh, 1879 and Armodoris Minichev, 1972 with description of a new species of Akiodoris and description of the new family Akiodorididae // Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2005. Vol. 56. N 1. P. 1—22.
Review
For citations:
Martynov A.V. A NEW CONCEPT OF ONTOGENETIC SYSTEMATICS: TOWARD TO SYNTHESIS OF TAXONOMY, ONTOGENY AND PHYLOGENETICS. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2010;(4):17-20. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2010-4-17-20
Views:
303
Email this article 