Preview

Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya

Advanced search

IMPACT OF TECHNOGENIC POLLUTION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT ON INDICATORS OF VITALITY OF URBAN BIOTA (MOLLUSK FAUNA, SOIL MESOFAUNA, EPIPHYTIC LICHENS)

Abstract

The article presents the results of ecological, chemical and bioindication assessment of urban
ecosystem of industrial city of the South of Ukraine. The dynamics of physical and chemical
parameters of soil, surface water and air in various functional areas of the city was analyzed. The complex index of pollution of environment components was determined. Bioindicative assess ment of the ecological state of the territory of urban ecosystem in terms of vitality of epiphytic lichen flora, soil mesofauna and freshwater mollusk fauna was fulfilled. Based on vital bioindicators, zones with different ecological state of the territory were differentiated. The toxic effects of various pollutants on living organisms and the tolerance of some species-bioindicators under anthropogenic load were analyzed. It was found that on anthropogenically transformed areas the amount of zoophages increases and homogenization of anamorphoscope composition of major groups of mesopotamians with the dominance of individual species is observed. In alkaline soils of the functional areas of urban ecosystem prevalence of calcicole — millipedes, pill bugs, gastropods was noted, which allows to use them to indicate the level of alkalization of soils. The degree of correlation between the viability of bio-indicators groups and complex pollution index of basic components of the environment of the city was defined. So, an inverse correlation between the vitality of epiphytic lichen flora (G,%) and the complex index (Pa) of environmental contamination (–0,80, p < 0,05), and direct correlation between the decline in the vitality of the soil mesofauna (G̅, %) and complex index (Zc) of soil contamination (0,84, p < 0, 05) was indicated. Thus, biomorphs of epiphytic lichen flora and separate groups of mesopotamians should be used as indicators of pollution of urban environment. Based on the fulfilled study the algorithm of complex ecological, chemical and bioindication assessment of ecological state of urban ecosystem of industrial city was proposed.

About the Author

N. V. Yorkina
Khmelnitsky Melitopol State Pedagogical University
Russian Federation


References

1. Larsen R.S., Bell J.N.B., James P.W., Chimonides P.J., Rumsey F.J., Tremper A., Purvis O.W. Lichen and bryophyte distribution on oak in London in relation to air pollution and bark acidity // Environmental Pollution. 2007. Vol. 146. N 2. P. 332–340.

2. Wolseley P.A., James P.W., Theobald M.R., Sutton M.A. Detecting changes in epiphytic lichen communities at sites affected by atmospheric ammonia from agricultural sources// Lichenologist. 2006. Vol. 38. N 2. P. 161–176.

3. Бязров Л.Г. Изменение видового разнообразия эпифитных лишайников г. Москвы — сравнение учетов 1988-1991 и 2006 годов [Электронный ресурс] // A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution. 2007. URL: http://www.sevin.ru (дата обращения 10.05.2012)

4. Veselkin D.V., Calako V.A., Vlasenko W.E. The relationship between the characteristics of the state of Scots Pine trees and tree stands in the large industrial city // Contemp. Probl. Ecol. 2015. N 2. P. 301–309.

5. Uzbekov A.K., Uzbekov M.A. Effects of industrial pollution on the respiratory disaeses. Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2015. Vol. 70. N 1 P. 17–22.

6. Бадтиев Ю.С. Методология биодиагностики качества окружающей среды военных объектов: Автореф. дис. … докт. биол. наук. М., 2006. 48 с.

7. Калабеков А.Л. Структурно-функциональная организация и экологический мониторинг урбосистемы мегаполиса: Автореф. дис. … докт. биол. наук. М., 2003. 38 с.

8. Buckland S.T., Magurran A.E. Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices // Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B, Biol. Sci. 2005. Vol. 360. N 12. P. 243–254.

9. Sverlova N. Landschnecken-Farbpolymorphismus aus physikalischen Gründen (Gastropoda: Pulmonata: Stylommatophora) // Malak. Abh. Mus. Tierkde. Dresden. 2004. B. 22. S. 131–145.

10. Lavelle P. Diversity of soil fauna and ecosystem function // Biol. Intern. 1996. Vol. 33. P. 3–16.

11. Dunger W., Voigtländer K. Soil fauna (Lumbricidae, Collembola, Diplopoda and Chilopoda) as indicators of soil eco-subsystem development in post-mining sites of eastern

12. Germany — a review // Soil Organisms. 2009. Vol. 81. N 1. P. 1–51.

13. Ganin G. N. The early bioindication of the HM’s pollution (for example pedobionts) // Papers presented at the Fourth European conference on ecotoxicology and environmental

14. safety, Metz, France, August 25-28, 1996. Metz, 1996. P. 11.

15. Van Dobben H.F., ter Braak C.J.F. Ranking of epiphytic lichen sensitivity to air pollution using survey data: a comparison of indicator scales // Lichenologist. 1999. Vol. 31.

16. № 1. P. 27–39.


Review

For citations:


Yorkina N.V. IMPACT OF TECHNOGENIC POLLUTION OF URBAN ENVIRONMENT ON INDICATORS OF VITALITY OF URBAN BIOTA (MOLLUSK FAUNA, SOIL MESOFAUNA, EPIPHYTIC LICHENS). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2016;(3):73-80. (In Russ.)

Views: 294


ISSN 0137-0952 (Print)