ON THE CELL BIOLOGY OF AGING TEACHING AT HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY
https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2012-1-15-19
Abstract
The approaches to teaching, as part of the appropriate agreements, the cell biology of aging (cytogerontology) by scientists of the School of Biology of Lomonosov Moscow State University at the Department of Life Science and Engineering of Harbin Institute of Technology (China) are described. Drawing attention to some differences in teaching biology between two institutions the authors emphasize the importance of system approach to the cytogerontology studying. The approach makes absolutely necessary an introductory course on basics of biology of aging. It is concluded that literal perception of the data of modern molecular-cell cytogerontological investigations by the students from both institutions is impossible without understanding the fundamental notions and definitions used in both theoretical and experimental gerontology.
About the Authors
Lijun WeiRussian Federation
Yu Li
Russian Federation
Jie He
Russian Federation
A. N. Khokhlov
Russian Federation
References
1. Hayflick L. Progress in cytogerontology // Mech. Ageing Dev. 1979. Vol. 9. N 5—6. P. 393—408.
2. Khokhlov A.N. Cytogerontology at the beginning of the third millenium: from “correlative” to “gist” models // Russ. J. Dev. Biol. 2003. Vol. 34. N 5. P. 321—326.
3. Khokhlov A.N. From Carrel to Hayflick and back, or what we got from the 100-year cytogerontological studies // Biophysics. 2010. Vol. 55. N 5. P. 850—855.
4. Хохлов А.Н. Итоги и перспективы цитогеронтологических исследований на современном этапе // Цитология. 2002. Т. 44. № 12. С. 1143—1148.
5. Хохлов А.Н. Пролиферация и старение // Итоги науки и техники ВИНИТИ АН СССР. Сер. Общие проблемы физико-химической биологии. Т. 9. М.: ВИНИТИ, 1988. 176 с.
6. Хохлов А.Н. Эволюционная цитогеронтология как наука и перспективы ее развития в Московском университете // Цитология. 1994. Т. 36. № 7. С. 757—758.
7. Khokhlov A.N. ABC of gerontology training at Moscow State University // Biogerontology. 2002. Vol. 3. Suppl. 1. P. 61.
8. Khokhlov A.N. Teaching biology of aging at Moscow State University // Усп. геронтол. 2000. Т. 13. № 5. С. 98.
9. Khokhlov A.N. Teaching biology of aging at Moscow State University // Gerontology. 2001. Vol. 47. Suppl. 1. P. 537.
10. Оловников А.М. Принцип маргинотомии в матричном синтезе полинуклеотидов // Докл. АН СССР. 1971. Т. 201. № 6. С. 1496—1499.
11. Cristofalo V.J., Allen R.G., Pignolo R.J., Martin B.G., Beck J.C. Relationship between donor age and the replicative lifespan of human cells in culture: a reevaluation // Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998. Vol. 95. N 18. P. 10614—10619.
12. Khokhlov A.N. Does aging need an own program or the existing development program is more than enough? // Russ. J. Gen. Chem. 2010. Vol. 80. N 7. P. 1507—1513.
13. Comfort A. Ageing: the biology of senescence. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1964. 365 p.
14. Hayflick L. How and why we age. New York: Ballantine Books, 1994. 377 p.
15. Austad S.N. Why we age: what science is discovering about the body’s journey through life. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 1999. 256 p.
16. Finch C.E. Longevity, senescence, and the genome. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994. 938 p.
17. Holliday R. Aging: the paradox of life. Why we age. Dordrecht: Springer, 2007. 134 p.
Review
For citations:
Wei L., Li Yu., He J., Khokhlov A.N. ON THE CELL BIOLOGY OF AGING TEACHING AT HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND LOMONOSOV MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2012;(1):15-19. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2012-1-15-19
Views:
337
Email this article 