ANALYSIS INSERTIONS PDR1 RETROTRANSPOSON IN THE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.)
https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2012-2-9-12
Abstract
The research of polymorphism PDR1 insertions grades, lines and mutants of peas by means of seven pairs specific RBIP — primers is carried out in this work. There are identified seven PDR1 loci of inserts in the investigated forms of peas. The high level of polymorphism of inserts retrotransposon PDR1 with primers RBIP2, RBIP1794, RBIP64 which has made 92, 82,98, 78% accordingly is established. The genetic analysis in populations of hybrids F2 (Chi115 Ѕ WL1238) is lead. RBIP700 polymorphic fragment is localized on a genetic card of peas in III group of coupling.
About the Authors
Z. G. KokaevaRussian Federation
A. V. Aleshin
Russian Federation
Y. I. Beriozov
Russian Federation
References
1. Flavell A.J., Knox M.R., Pearce S.R. Retrotransposonbased insertion polymorphisms (RBIP) for high throughput marker analysis // Plant J. 1998. Vol. 16. P. 643—650.
2. Schulman A.H. Molecular markers to assess genetic diversity // Euphytica on-line. 2006. P. 1—9.
3. Kalendar R., Schulman A. IRAP and REMAP for retrotransposon — based genotyping and fingerprinting // Nature Protocols. 2006. Vol. 1. N 5. P. 2478—2484.
4. Vershinin A.V., Allnutt T.R., Knox M.R., Ambrose M.J., Ellis T.H.N. Ttransposable elements reveal the impact of introgression, rather than transposition, in Pisum divercity, evolution, and domestication // Molec. Biol. Evol. 2003. Vol. 20. N 12. P. 2067—2075.
5. Smэkal P., Horasec J., Dostalova, Hybl M. Variety discrimination in pea (Pisum sativum L.) by molecylar, biochemical and morphological markers // Genet. 2008. Vol. 49. N 2. P. 155—166.
6. Jing R., Vershinin A., Grzebytaet J., Shaw P., Smykal P., Marshall D., Ambrose M.J., Ellis T.H.N., Flavell A.J. The genetic diversity and evolution of field pea (Pisum) studied by high throughput retrotransposon based insertion polymorphism (RBIP) marker analysis // BMC Evol. Biol. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 44.
7. Weeden N.F., Ellis T.H.N., Timmerman-Vaughan G.M., Swiecicki W.K., Rozov S.M., Berdnikov V.A. A consensus linkage map for Pisum sativum // Pisum Genetics. 1998. Vol. 30. P. 1—4.
8. Waugh R., McLean K., Flavell A.J., Pearce S.R., Kumar A., Thomas B.T., Powell W. Genetic distribution of BARE-1 retrotransposable elements in the Barley (Hordeum vulgare) genome revealed by sequence-specific amplification polymorphisms (S-SAP) // Mol. Gen. Genet. 1997. Vol. 253. P. 687—694.
9. Кокаева З.Г., Гостимский С.А. Идентификация сортов и линий гороха с помощью молекулярных маркеров, основанных на ретротранспозонах // Сельскохозяйственная биология. 2007. № 3. C. 38—43.
10. Кокаева З.Г., Алешин А.В. Паспортизация сортов гороха посевного (Pisum sativum L.) // Доклады Московского общества испытателей природы, посвященные 205-летию МОИП. 2010. Т. 47. C. 52—54.
11. Чегамирза К. Молекулярно-генетическое картирование локусов качественных и количественных признаков у гороха: Автореф. дис. ... канд. биол. наук. М., 2004. 26 с.
12. Lee D., Ellis T.H.N., Turner L., Hellens R.P., Cleary W.G. A copia — like element in Pisum demonstrates the uses of dispersed repeated in genetic analysis // Plant Mol. Biol. 1990. Vol. 15. P. 707—722.
13. Torres A.M., Weeden N.F., Martin A. Linkage among isozyme, RFLP and RAPD markers in Vicia faba // Theor. Appl. Genet. 1993. Vol. 85. P. 937—945.
14. Schneider K. Mapping populations and principles of genetic mapping // The handbook of plant genome mapping. Genetic and physical mapping / Eds. K. Meksem, G. Kahl. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2005.
15. Коновалов Ф.А. Картирование и молекулярно-генетический анализ генов гороха (Pisum sativum L.): Автореф. дис. ... канд. биол. наук. М., 2006. 24 с.
16. Brauner S., Murphy R.L., Walling J.G., Przyborowski J., Weeden N.F. STS markers for comparative mapping in legumes // J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 2002. Vol. 127. N 4. P. 616—622.
Review
For citations:
Kokaeva Z.G., Aleshin A.V., Beriozov Y.I. ANALYSIS INSERTIONS PDR1 RETROTRANSPOSON IN THE PEA (PISUM SATIVUM L.). Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2012;(2):9-12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2012-2-9-12
Views:
248
Email this article 