Preview

Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya

Advanced search

BIOTIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TWO SPECIES OF MICROALGAE IN THE MIXED CULTURE

Abstract

Biotic interactions in a mixed culture of two microalgae species — Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turp.) Breb. and Monoraphidium arcuatum (Korsch.) Hind., used in bioassay in monocultures as test objects, were studied. The toxic effect of cell-free filtrates from different “ages” monoculture (2, 7, 10, 15, 21 and 28 days) S. quadricauda on the growth of the “young” test culture M. arcuatum and, conversely, the toxic effect of cell-free filtrates from the different “ages” (2, 7, 10, 15, 21 and 28 days) monoculture M. arcuatum on the growth of the “young” test culture S. quadricauda was evaluated. Simultaneously the toxicity of their own filtrates of different “ages” was monitored by a test culture of each species. The interactions of the species in the mixed culture can be regarded as negative, such as antagonistic, when both populations inhibit the growth of each other through metabolites and food resource competition, while the effect of S. quadricauda on M. arcuatum is much stronger. The main factor constraining the growth of monoculture S. quadricauda is the rapid depletion of the food resource from the medium, and not the inhibition of growth by its own metabolites. The depletion of the food resources from the medium in monoculture M. arcuatum occurs much later than in monoculture S. quadricauda. Metabolites of S. quadricauda cause a strong inhibitory effect on the growth of M. arcuatum, and the metabolites of M. arcuatum—a weak inhibitory effect on the growth of S. quadricauda. The filtrates of the “old” culture of S. quadricauda (21–28 days) cause the greatest inhibitory effect on the process of cell division of M. arcuatum. The filtrates of the “old” culture S. quadricauda (21–28 days) cause the greatest inhibitory effect on the process of cell division of M. arcuatum. A comparative analysis of the cell number dynamics of two species S. quadricauda and M. arcuatum in mono- and two-species algal cultures, as well as experiments with filtrates of these monocultures, showed that the interaction of species can be explained by the food resource competition and allelopathic interaction (exometabolite effect).

About the Authors

M. A. Mikheev
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Department of Hydrobiology, School of Biology


V. I. Ipatova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Department of Hydrobiology, School of Biology


N. E. Spirkina
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation
Department of Genetics, School of Biology


References

1. Sommer U. The impact of light intensity and daylength on silicate and nitrate competition among marine phytoplankton // Limnol. Oceanogr. 1994. Vol. 39. N 7. P. 1680–1688.

2. Cembella A. Chemical ecology of eukaryotic microalgae in marine ecosystems // Phycologia. 2003. Vol. 42. N 4. P. 420–447.

3. Tillmann U., Alpermann T., John U., Cembella A. Allelochemical interactions and short-term effects of the dino-flagellate Alexandrium on selected photoautotrophic and heterotrophic protists // Harmful Algae. 2008. Vol. 7. N 1. P. 52–64.

4. Zak A., Musiewicz K., Kosakowska A. Allelopathic activity of the Baltic cyanobacteria against microalgae // Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2012. Vol. 112. P. 4–10.

5. Nabivailo Yu.V., Skriptsova A.V., Titlyanov E.A. The interspecific relationships of seaweeds and their role in the formation of communities of Ahnfeltia tobuchiensis (Kanno et Matsubara, 1932) Makienko, 1970 (Rhodophyta) // Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2014. Vol. 40. N 5. P. 344–353.

6. Nabivailo Yu.V., Titlyanov E.A. Competitive relationships in natural and artificial algal communities // Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2014. Vol. 32. N 1. P. 521–531.

7. Белевич Т.А., Запара Е.В., Ильяш Л.В. Взаимодей-ствие между планктонными водорослями при разных источниках азота // Усп. совр. биол. 2009. Т. 129. № 4. С. 379–385.

8. Novoveská L., Franks D.T., Wulfers T.A. Henley W.J. Stabilizing continuous mixed cultures of microalgae // Algal Res. 2016. Vol. 13. P. 126–133.

9. Hong Y., Xu K. Co-existing growth relationships of a lipid-producing alga with three microalgae // Allelopathy J. 2013. Vol. 32. N 2. P. 301–314.

10. Спиркина Н.Е., Ипатова В.И., Дмитриева А.Г., Филенко О.Ф. Сравнительная динамика роста культур микроводорослей видов Monoraphidium arcuatum (Korsch.) Hind. и Scenedesmus quadricauda (Turp.) Bréb. // Бюлл. МОИП. Отд. биол. 2014. Т. 119. № 2. С. 64–69.

11. Ilyash L.V., Belevich T.A. Interaction between populations of marine microalgae Prorocentrum micans and Platy-monas viridis in mixed cultures // Russ. J. Aquatic Ecol. 1996. Vol. 5. N 1. P. 21–26.


Review

For citations:


Mikheev M.A., Ipatova V.I., Spirkina N.E. BIOTIC INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TWO SPECIES OF MICROALGAE IN THE MIXED CULTURE. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2018;73(2):78-84. (In Russ.)

Views: 345


ISSN 0137-0952 (Print)