MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY IN SYSTEMATICS OF OLIGOCHAETA: PRO ET CONTRA
https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2010-4-39-41
Abstract
Systematics of oligochaete worms during all 20th century caused discussions of experts. With development of computing and implementation of molecular methods, there was an opportunity to built phylogenetically justified system. Nevertheless eliminating of some paraphyletic lineages has not caused unanimous approval of the broad audience of biologists (taxonomists, ecologists, etc.). Molecular systematics has helped to clear up position of many disputable species and genera, simultaneously having raised the doubts in classification of high rank taxa seemed to be logical and firm until recently.
References
1. Michaelsen W. Zur Stammesgeschichte der Oligocha- eten // Zeitschr. Wiss. Zool. 1929. Vol. 134. P. 693—716.
2. Livanow N. Die Organization der Hirudineen und die Beziehungen dieser Gruppe zu den Oligochaeten // Ergeb. Fortschritte Zool. 1931. Vol. 7. P. 387—484.
3. Чекановская О.В. Водные малощетинковые черви фауны СССР. М.; Л.: Изд-во АН СССР, 1962. 411 с.
4. Martin P., Kaygorodova I., Sherbakov D, Verheyen E. Rapidly evolving lineages impede the resolution of phyloge- netic relationships among Clitellata (Annelida) // Mol. Phy- logenet. Evol. 2000. Vol. 15. P. 355—368.
5. Martin P. On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta // Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 2001. Vol. 268. P. 1089—1098.
6. Siddall M., Apakupakul K., Burreson E., Coates K., Erseus C., Kallersjo M., Gelder S., Trapido-Rosenthal H. Va¬lidating Livanow: molecular data agree that leeches, branchi- obdellidans and Acanthobdella peledina are a monophyletic group of oligochaetes // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001. Vol. 21. P. 346—351.
7. Кайгородова И.А, Щербаков Д.Ю. Молекулярно- филогенетическое исследование положения байкальских олигохет в системе Clitellata // Генетика. 2006. Т. 42(12). C. 1647—1655.
8. Erseus C., Kallersjo M. 18S rDNA phylogeny of Clitel- lata (Annelida) // Zool. Scripta. 2004. Vol. 33. P. 187—196.
9. Purschke G. Terrestrial polychaetes — models for the evolution of the Clitellata (Annelida)? // Hydrobiologia. 1999. Vol. 406. P. 87—99.
10. Erseus C., Kallersjo M., Ekman M., Hovmoller R. 18S rDNA phylogeny of the Tubificidae (Clitellata) and its cons¬tituent taxa: dismissal of the Naididae // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2002. Vol. 22. P. 414—422.
11. Envall I., Kallersjo M., Erseus C. Molecular evidence for the non-monophyletic status of Naidinae (Annelida, Cli- tellata, Tubificidae) // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2006. Vol. 40(2). P. 570—584.
12. Erseus C., Envall I., Marchese M., Gustavsson L. The systematic position of Opistocystidae (Annelida, Clitellata) re¬vealed by DNA data // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2010. Vol. 54(1). P. 309—313.
13. Kaygorodova I., Liventseva V. A test of monophyly of the genus Rhynchelmis Hoffmeister, 1843 (Oligochaeta, Lum- briculidae): morphology based phylogeny // Investigated in Russia. 2007. Vol. 139e. P. 1517—1527.
14. Кайгородова И.А. Молекулярно-филогенетическое исследование эволюционной истории байкальских люмбрикулид (Oligochaeta, Annelida): Автореф. дис. ... канд. биол. наук. Новосибирск: Институт цитологии и генети¬ки, 2000. 16 с.
15. Kaygorodova I., Sherbakov D., Martin P. Molecular phylogeny of Baikalian Lumbriculidae (Oligochaeta): Eviden¬ce for recent explosive speciation // Comp. Cytogenet. 2007. Vol. 1(1). P. 71—84.
16. Hrabe S. Contribution to the knowledge of Oligochaeta from the lake Baikal //Vest. cs. Spolec. zool. 1982. Vol. 46. P. 174—193.
17. Martin P., Ferraguti M., Kaygorodova I. Description of two new species of Rhynchelmis (Oligochaeta: Lumbri- culidae) from Lake Baikal (Russia), using classical morpho¬logy and ultrastructure of spermatozoa // Ann. Limnol. 1998. Vol. 34(3). P. 283—293.
18. Cook D.G. Family Lumbriculidae // Aquatic Oligoc- haeta of the World / Eds. R.O. Brinkhurst, B.G.M. Jamieson. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd, 1971. P. 200—285.
19. Кайгородова И.А., Ливенцева В.Г. Молекулярная филогения байкальского букета видов Lamprodrilus (Oli- gochaeta, Lumbriculidae) // Изв. ИГУ. 2008. Т. 1(2). С. 52—55.
20. Sturmbauer C., Opadiya G., Niederstatter H., Ried- mann A., Dallinger R. Mitochondrial DNA reveals cryptic oli- gochaete species differing in cadmium resistance // Mol. Biol. Evol. 1999. Vol. 16. P. 967—974.
21. Beauchamp K., Kathman R., McDowell T., Hedrick R. Molecular phylogeny of tubificid oligochaetes with special emphasis on Tubifex tubifex (Tubificidae) // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2001. Vol. 19. P. 216—224.
22. Gustafsson D.R., Price D.A., Erseus C. Genetic variation in the popular lab worm Lumbriculus variegatus (Annelida: Clitellata: Lumbriculidae) reveals cryptic speciation // Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2009. Vol. 51(2). P. 182—189.
Review
For citations:
Kaygorodova I.A. MOLECULAR PHYLOGENY IN SYSTEMATICS OF OLIGOCHAETA: PRO ET CONTRA. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2010;(4):39-41. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.1234/XXXX-XXXX-2010-4-39-41
Views:
290
Email this article 