Preview

Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya

Advanced search

ON THE CONSTRUCTING OF SURVIVAL CURVES FOR CULTURED CELLS IN CYTOGERONTOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS: A BRIEF NOTE WITH THREE HIERARCHY DIAGRAMS

Abstract

A brief comparative analysis of different approaches to cell viability testing in cytogerontological experiments is made. Particular emphasis is placed upon problems arising under constructing of survival curves for cultured cells in the “stationary phase aging” model. It is noted that the choice of the appropriate methods is mainly determined by the researchers‘ ideas about molecular and cellular mechanisms of aging. It is emphasized that the evaluation of cell cloning efficiency, though optimal for cell viability determination, is, unfortunately, non­applicable to postmitotic or very slowly propagating cells. Some problems encountered when using the most popular molecular probes designed for “live/dead” assays of cell population are also briefly reviewed.

About the Authors

A. N. Khokhlov
биологический факультет МГУ
Russian Federation


G. V. Morgunova
биологический факультет МГУ
Russian Federation


References

1. Хохлов А.Н. Пролиферация и старение // Итоги на­уки и техники ВИНИТИ АН СССР. Сер. Общие проб­лемы физико­химической биологии. Т. 9. М.: ВИНИТИ, 1988. 176 с.

2. Khokhlov A.N. Stationary cell cultures as a tool for gerontological studies // Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1992. Vol. 663. P. 475—476.

3. Khokhlov A.N. Does aging need its own program, or is the program of development quite sufficient for it? Stationary cell cultures as a tool to search for anti­aging factors // Curr. Aging Sci. 2013. Vol. 6. N 1. P. 14—20.

4. Khokhlov A.N. Impairment of regeneration in aging: appropriateness or stochastics? // Biogerontology. 2013. Vol. 14. N 6. P. 703—708.

5. Khokhlov A.N. Evolution of the term “cellular senescence” and its impact on the current cytogerontological research // Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2013. Vol. 68. N 4. P. 158—161.

6. Khokhlov A.N., Klebanov A.A., Karmushakov A.F., Shilovsky G.A., Nasonov M.M., Morgunova G.V. Testing of geroprotectors in experiments on cell cultures: choosing the correct model system // Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2014. Vol. 69. N 1. P. 10—14.

7. Khokhlov A.N. From Carrel to Hayflick and back, or what we got from the 100­ year cytogerontological studies // Biophysics. 2010. Vol. 55. N 5. P. 859—864.

8. Yablonskaya O.I., Ryndina T.S., Voeikov V.L., Khokhlov A.N. A paradoxical effect of hydrated C60­fullerene at an ultralow concentration on the viability and aging of cultured Chinese hamster cells // Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2013. Vol. 68. N 2. P. 63—68.

9. Kroemer G., Galluzzi L., Vandenabeele P. et al. Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009 // Cell Death Differ. 2009. Vol. 16. N 1. P. 3—11.

10. Berridge M.V., Herst P.M., Tan A.S. Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction // Biotechnol. Annu. Rev. 2005. Vol. 11. P. 127—152.

11. Keepers Y.P., Pizao P.E., Peters G.J., van Ark­Otte J., Winograd B., Pinedo H.M. Comparison of the sulforhodamine B protein and tetrazolium (MTT) assays for in vitro chemosensitivity testing // Eur. J. Cancer. 1991. Vol. 27. N 7. P. 897—900.

12. Stoddart M.J. Cell viability assays: introduction // Methods Mol. Biol. 2011. Vol. 740. P. 1—6.

13. Reddy A., Caler E.V., Andrews N.W. Plasma membrane repair is mediated by Ca2+­regulated exocytosis of lysosomes // Cell. 2001. Vol. 106. N 2. P. 157—169.

14. Khokhlov A.N., Prokhorov L.Yu., Ivanov A.S., Archakov A.I. Effects of cholesterol­ or 7­ketocholesterol­containing liposomes on colony­forming ability of cultured cells // FEBS Lett. 1991. Vol. 290. N 1—2. P. 171—172.

15. Smith J.R., Venable S., Roberts T.W., Metter E.J., Monticone R., Schneider E.L. Relationship between in vivo age and in vitro aging: assessment of 669 cell cultures derived from members of the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging // J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2002. Vol. 57. N 6. P. B239—B246.

16. Maier A.B., Maier I.L., van Heemst D., Westendorp R.G. Colony formation and colony size do not reflect the onset of replicative senescence in human fibroblasts // J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2008. Vol. 63. N 7. P. 655—659.

17. Good P.I., Smith J.R. Age distribution of human diploid fibroblasts. A stochastic model for in vitro aging // Biophys. J. 1974. Vol. 14. N 11. P. 811—823.

18. Smith J.R., Pereira­Smith O., Good P.I. Colony size distribution as a measure of age in cultured human cells. A brief note // Mech. Ageing Dev. 1977. Vol. 6. N 4. P. 283—286.

19. Kuczek T., Axelrod D.E. Tumor cell heterogeneity: divided­colony assay for measuring drug response // Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1987. Vol. 84. N 13. P. 4490—4494.

20. Alinkina E.S., Vorobyova A.K., Misharina T.A., Fatkullina L.D., Burlakova E.B., Khokhlov A.N. Cytogerontological studies of biological activity of oregano essential oil // Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2012. Vol. 67. N 2. P. 52—57.

21. Khokhlov A.N., Morgunova G.V., Ryndina T.S., Coll F. Pilot study of a potential geroprotector, “Quinton Marine Plasma”, in experiments on cultured cells // Moscow Univ. Biol. Sci. Bull. 2015. Vol. 70. N 1. P. 7—11.


Review

For citations:


Khokhlov A.N., Morgunova G.V. ON THE CONSTRUCTING OF SURVIVAL CURVES FOR CULTURED CELLS IN CYTOGERONTOLOGICAL EXPERIMENTS: A BRIEF NOTE WITH THREE HIERARCHY DIAGRAMS. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta. Seriya 16. Biologiya. 2015;(2):19-23. (In Russ.)

Views: 500


ISSN 0137-0952 (Print)